Volume 2 (April), 2019: 77 – 89. POLITICAL ECONOMY OF PROMOTIONAL STRATEGIES AND THE GROWTH OF SMALL AND MEDIUM SCALE ENTERPRISES IN AFRICA: THE CASE OF NIGERIA


POLITICAL ECONOMY OF PROMOTIONAL STRATEGIES AND THE GROWTH OF SMALL AND MEDIUM SCALE ENTERPRISES IN AFRICA:
THE CASE OF NIGERIA
Nelson Goldpin OBAH-AKPOWOGHAHA, PhD
Department of Politics and International Relations;
North West University, South Africa
                                          &
Bridget Uchenna EGWU
Department of Management and Accounting,
Faculty of Administration
Obafemi Awolowo University,
Ile-Ife, Nigeria


Abstract

This study examined the Political Economy of Promotional Strategies and Growth of Small and Medium Scale Enterprises (also called small-scale enterprise) in Africa with a special focus on Nigeria. The data for this study were generated through the administration of a questionnaire to entrepreneurs and managers of small and medium scale enterprises (SMEs) in Nigeria. Convenience sampling was used to select 40 respondents from each category of SSEs totaling 240 entrepreneurs. Data gathered were analyzed using descriptive statistics such as tables, percentages and linear regression. The results showed that the various promotional strategies used in Nigeria by SSEs included a display (25%), advertising (18%), radio (19%), television (15%), gifts items (12%), and billboard (13%). SSEs never used broadcasting, promotions (68%), out of home (68%), and print media (63%), that could have enhanced their performance. Results also showed that the results major factors that influenced the choice of promotional strategies used by SSEs were the cost implication of using the PS (73%), resources of the SSEs (79%) and growth orientation (73%), while other factors included location of business (71%), management approach (86%), and overall success and survival rate (75%).  Finally, the results showed that promotional strategies had no significant effect on the growth of SSEs in Nigeria [advertising (t=0.53;p<0.05), sales promotion (t=1.01; p.0.05), and product packaging t=0.80, p>0.05)].  The study concluded that promotional strategies enhance the growth of SSEs, none - the- less, the Nigeria small-scale enterprises failed to use the promotional strategies to their advantage. 
Keywords: Nigeria. Political Economy, Promotional Strategies, Small-scale Enterprises
Corresponding Author*



Introduction
Industrial revolution of world economy has given more space to local investors which has galvanized into Small-scale Enterprise (SSE) that are mainly run by capitalists whose employees fall below 500. It operates within a small segment of an economic system where other market forces are at competition for space in context of demand and supply. Studies have revealed that the development of African economy can be aided through government intervention in SSE, giving soft loan and creating a conducive atmosphere for it to thrive (European Commission, 2003; United Nations, 2008). Consequently, project implementation, communal crises, ethnic bigotry and among others have affected the budgetary allocation of most government in Africa in creating good atmosphere for SSEs to thrive. While literature on SSEs surveys have stressed the important of SSEs for economic reawakening in African economies (World Bank, 2010; 12; Zwinoira, 2015 cited in Muriithi, 2017). Explicitly,  issues that have served as  a challenge to proposed SSEs’ owners in Africa are the problems of consistence power supply; modern technologies; and basic knowledge about what entails SSEs. This situation has worsened due to the plaque of corruption bedeviling governmental institutions in the African political system and it has constituted a huge barrier to its viable emergence in the continent (Obah-Akpowoghaha et al., 2014).
     Nigeria and other African countries have been entangled with inconsistent policy reforms, changing regulatory policies, volatile market place and rapidly evolving technological advancement have exposed businesses thus leading to an unpredictable business environment which continues to pose challenges to SSEs ability to compete favourably and remain profitable in the continent. Despite the overall importance of SSEs, every year many of them fail in their tens of thousands in most African countries especially in Nigeria and this has been associated with low support from the Nigerian government and the problem of insecurity. 
     At the onset of the new millennium, 24 per cent of businesses in the South failed within the period of two economic years and while the total of 63 per cent were incapacitated within six years in the global economic system (Wheelen and Hunger, 2000).  In Nigeria, many of these businesses experienced premature deaths which may be associated to weak governmental institutions, and because of the crucial role played by these SSEs, there is an increasing need to understand the peculiarity of this sector to ensure its growth and sustainability.  Essien (1995) notes that this failure rate is frightening and attributes it to militating factors such as poor management, lack of human resources and low production capacity among others. Despite the fact that these factors have been studied and improved upon, SSEs continue to be plagued by poor performance levels and high failures rates still persist till date even in the face of increasing government support and interventions. There is therefore the need to investigate how promotional strategies affect the growth of SSEs in Nigeria; hence this study.
     Scholarly works have indicated that the importance of effective promotional strategies cannot be overemphasized especially in the developing world where the need to encourage local investors as a synergy to boost economic growth is highly needed (Peter and Philip, 2006). But the need to embrace modern technologies have retrogressed the development of SSEs in most African countries (Obah-Akpowoghaha, 2014). Corroborating the above observations, Essien (1995), noted that most small firms fail to see the need for advertising, sales promotion, employing sales men and other forms of promotional strategies in their business pursuit. Also, they highlighted the opinion that inadequate knowledge and understanding of all the basic functions and importance of promotional strategies by entrepreneurs/managers are deadly problems faced by many small-scale businesses. Extrapolating from various scholarly works on SSEs, the place of SSEs towards revolutionising African economy is germane such as in the area of massive employment, growth of economic indices like Gross Domestic Product, and effective device for poverty reduction.
     However, in Africa, a business is considered SSEs which is sometimes called small and medium enterprises (SMEs) if it employs below 100 employees and this is also applicable to the continent of Asia, while in some advanced states like US, conceptualisation of SSEs or SMEs is based on when the employees fall below 500. Detail explanations on the context and concept of SSEs will be expatiated in the course of conceptual review. Nevertheless, items such as the volume of annual demand and supply made by a capitalist determined the nature or description whether the business underpin SSEs or not. Also profit either quarterly or monthly in relation to balance sheet total are part of the features use to denote SSEs. There are complex variables used to capture the meaning of the idea of SSEs (Muriithi, 2017), but most of these academic definitions lack political economy undertones that underscore government interventions, accessible loan, creation of infrastructural facilities and good taxation policies for SSEs owners.
In a nutshell, this study will underscore political economy and promotional strategies of SSEs in Africa with special on Nigeria. The general goal of this investigation is to probe the effect of promotional strategies on the growth of small scale enterprises in Nigeria and identify the efforts of governments towards SSEs development. And others are to examine the various promotional strategies used by SSEs in Nigeria; investigate the factors that influence the choice of the promotional strategies adopted by SSEs; and evaluate the effect of promotional strategies on the growth of SSEs in the country. This led to the testing of hypothesis that shown there is no significant relationship between the promotional strategies and growth of SSEs; and there is significant relationship between promotional strategies and the growth of SSEs.
 Methodology
     The study will be carried out in Nigeria due to her population in Africa. The methodological approach in this study will be anchored on primary and secondary sources of data collection. Semi-Structured questionnaire will be adopted as mechanism to address the objectives, while secondary data from the Ministry of Trade and Commerce of the various states will be utilised.  The population comprised of registered and unregistered small-scale enterprises in Nigeria. The SSEs will be categorized into manufacturing and service rendering in Nigerian cities. Convenience sampling will be used in selecting forty respondents from each category of SSEs in the selected cities where they are largely concentrated; totaling 240 entrepreneurs. Descriptive and Inferential statistics will be applied to analyse the data. Descriptive Statistics such as frequency charts and percentages will be used for presentation of data. Inferential statistics to be used in testing hypotheses are chi–square and correlation analysis using statistical packages for social sciences (SPSS). At the bivariate level, chi-square test of analysis will be used to establish relationship between the variables while at the multivariate level, multinomial logistic regression will be adopted in respect to the research questions and test the hypotheses.
Small-scale Enterprises (SSEs): A Conceptual Review
The task of reviewing literature on what constitutes small and medium scale enterprises has not been an easy task because of the divergent views expressed by scholars in this area of study. There are interpretation of the numbers of employees; flows of income; assets; and the management. Most times it is been refer to as Small and medium enterprises (SMEs) or Small Scale Enterprises. And empirical investigations have dedicated into these forms of denotations towards economic growth and the strength of SMEs proliferation in a country. Its impact has been debated on against large firms and establishment in developed and developing societies. Consequently the thrust of scholarly debates on SME centre on poverty reduction; job creation; and increasing economic indices such as GDP. The shortfalls upon this literature are the inadequacy of disclosing the interplay of economies and politics in a country on SMEs.
     A Small-Scale Enterprise (and sometimes called small and medium enterprises, that is, SMEs) are businesses ventures owned by private individual (s) which usually embodied few persons with a relative low rate of turnover. The growth of such businesses arises out of stable political economic system engendered by the implementation of accessible loan to petty traders and other business owners. The important of SSEs to modern economy system have attracted global organizations. The European Commission (2003) and United Nations, (2008) have reiterated that SSEs are essential business that stir industrial revolution and economic growth.   In Sub-Saharan Africa, SMEs has impacted over 90 percent of the economy in the region that constitute relatively 95 per cent of operating firms (Hatega, 2007; Kauffmann, 2005 cited in Muriithi, 2017). This form of business has employed good number of youths in most developing economy and is very easy to manage and run. Due to the diverse nature of SMEs, scholarly definitions have attracted numerous variables that have made the concept of SMEs cumbersome to pin down. Like the investigation by Beck; Demirgüç-Kunt and Levine (2003) identified that SSEs do not enhance the quantity and quality of jobs which against other thoughts concerning the vital role of SSEs or SMEs in most developing economies.
In a study by Thorsten Beck, Asl1 Demirgüç-Kunt (2003), and Ross Levine on SME, Growth, and Poverty: Cross-Country Evidence revealed certain effects. The study adopted new database and put together consistent variables in the context of SME size for about 70 countries that cut cross developed and developing. The study established a nexus between growth and SME which is not impactful to the management of bias. Again countries investigations had shown a silence influence of SME on the revenue or incomes of poor people, although the study didn’t indicate the position of SMEs in relation to the measurement of the extent of poverty on nations. The study further revealed non-support on SMEs by certain institutions in order to boost national economic as against the thought of Pro-SMEs in order to tame abject poverty. The study as well maintained that a viable SME sector is an indication of successful economies; hence, the study revealed that inter-country investigations do no align with the view that SME boost ‘economic success.’  It further revealed that an enabling environment for all business is necessary for different levels of business in a country which foster healthy competition.
It added that good governmental policies of that entails border issues, functional patent rights, and the implementation of regulations and laws are prerequisites for accelerating the ‘growth rate of GDP per capita’. Which may not likely in consonance with subsidising of SMEs directly but do exhibit strength on the rewards of laws aid the summary of working environment of business. The study concluded that viable business atmosphere intensifies to assist poor income individuals to build overall economic indices, but the research findings do not aligned with the idea that a planned environment influences poverty in the context of the impact of general economy Beck et al (2003).
In another investigation carried out by Ancielo (1975 cited in Muriithi, 2017), in 75 countries revealed more than 70 definitions of SMEs that addressed issues premised on the prevailing indicators. In US and Canadian’s economies, SMEs are business ventures that accommodate less than 500 employees, Germany 250 employees, Belgium less than 100 employees and those that are called small business are the one that falls within 100 employees, and while in African countries like Nigeria any business above hundred employees can be termed big business. Within this dichotomy, scholars such as Beck & Cull, 2014; Dalberg, 2011; Fjose et al., 2010; Levine, 2005; Katia, 2014; OECD, 2005 cited in Muriithi, 2017) have accepted less 250 employees which strategically addresses developing economies.
Table: 1
Countries
Contribution to GDP (%)
Contribution to Employment
References
Ethiopia
3.4%
90%
Central Statistic Agency (CSA), 2003; Gebrehiwot, 2006
Ghana
70%
49%
Ghana Bank Doing Business Report, 2013; World Bank, 2006; Abor & Quartery, 2010;
Kanya
40-50%
80%
Mwarari & Ngugi, 2013;

Nigeria
50%
70%
Ariyo, 2011; Kolasiński, 2012;

Rwanda
20.5%
60%
Mukamuganga, 2011

South Africa
50-60%
60%
DTI, 2012; Willemse, 2010;

Tanzania
60%
20%
Echengreen & Tong, 2005; Ngasongwa, 2002
Uganda
18%
90%
Uganda Ministry of Trade, Industry and Cooperatives (MTIC), 2015

Zambia
8%
30%
Mbuta, 2007

Zimbabwe
40%
15%
Katua, 2014; Zwinoira, 2015


Adapted from Muriithi, (2017)

     The above table shows the relevance and effect of SMEs to some African economies. The configuration and concentration SMEs differ in countries, most times the service industries are responsible for over two-thirds of the jobs (Kamunge et al, 2014). The interaction of the economies and politics is strategic to the growth of SMEs. Politics provides the enabling environment for local investors to plan and see the need to multiply business activities. Evidently, assisting owners of SME easy access to loan for either expansion or creating branches in different location in a country, but this has not been adequately feasible in most African countries due to political violence among the ruling elite and budget deficits arising from prolonged debt servicing. Consequently, technologies are one of the driving forces for the success of SMEs in developed societies unlike African countries that are weak in infrastructure (Obah-Akpowoghaha et al., 2014)
     The study carried out by Muriithi, (2017) has identified issues like irregular power supply; shortage of fund; lack of technical know-how among employees; communication gap and primitive accumulation of wealth as challenges facing SMEs in most African countries. He noted that within the context of political economy, government’s investment and attention towards SMEs occupied little cycle of most African budget, a sector that can facilitate development and engage all levels or categories of classes in the society. Base on this pitfall, Muriithi stressed that African government should identify the place of SMEs in their annual budget as a promotional strategy to strengthen economic growth and development in the continent. He added that with positive ethical practices premised on robust legal arrangement, adequate infrastructural facilities such power supply, good road and so on can intensify the multiplication of SMEs, encouraging owners to be more creating in the business venture. He argued that SMEs can change the face of African economy if politics is not used for personal gain against national interest
Nature of Small-Scale Enterprises
     The characteristics of small-scale enterprises differ from country studies and in the context of developed to developing nations variables vary proportionally. The quantum of employees in a firm, total revenue, relatively small shares and so on constitute the nature of SSEs which most times are own and managed by private individual (s). Consequently, the vital role of SMEs in both developed and developing countries have faced series of academic debate. In the work of Beck et al (2003), revealed much about the weaknesses of SMEs which reflected on job availability and loss of the offer by most employees, and although has no scientific bearing with net employment availability and nature firm in the context size particularly. Biggs and Shah (1998) cited in Beck et al (2003) maintained that in most Sub-Saharan African countries, big firms are source of net job generation to the population arising from the manufacturing companies. In the context of comfortable and quality job, Beck et al have revealed that microeconomics indices have no much evidences or support of the notion as against large firms. That based on empirical evidences large firms offer more employment security, wage benefit and other lucrative incentives, employees go for SSEs when they could not get job in a multinational establishment or large firms. In another thought arising from Pro-SMEs that the activities of the business are simple and innovative than larger firms, and this was further buttressed by Acs and Audretsch (1987) cited in Beck et al. (2003), that SSEs or SMEs are flexible to innovations and technological advancement compare to large organizations with enormous skill intensive staff.
     Developing countries evidences revealed that the state of a firm has no favourable nexus on ‘SMEs subsidization’ that can foster technology and which will cause high rate of turnover. Again, Beck et. al. (2003) argued that Pro-SMEs believe that small firms intensify national GDP and positive pressures on national boom in the context of availability of goods and services. And the works of Little, Mazumdar and Page, (1987 cited in Beck et al, 2003) on productivity studies captured the idea that maximum productivities in an economy most times come from medium size businesses than small businesses. In nutshell, the argument of SSEs proponents or its opposing ideas can be seen from the perspective of developed and developing economies. Beck et al (2003) revealed that advanced states tend to have more financial strength to sustain and build SMEs compared to the developing world, and this expresses a lot of economic implications in activities of SSEs owners and the nature of the business
Strategies for Small-scale Enterprises Growth and Survival
     The methods and techniques to develop a business generally cut across a lot of variables and efforts from organization, government and the society. Modern day businesses revolve around technologies and ethics which enable the business venture to compete with other organizations.  The operational patterns of an organization in relation to ethical practices and human relations are paramount to the success and the growth of any business organization. In the context of Small-scale Enterprises or Small and Medium Enterprises, most times the owners fall short of funds to carry out marketing strategies but with the help of enabling environment put in place by the government in areas of affordable mass media such as national radio and Television; erecting of billboards; advertising on Newspapers are some of the ways SMEs can be assisted by the government. But series of literature on business in developing countries have identified issues like cultural defect; poor educational system; lack of infrastructural facilities and policy inconsistency as limitations to SMEs owners and the business itself (Obah-Akpowoghaha et al, 2014)
     Ayozie Daniel Ogechukwu et al., 2010 cited in Sheetal et al (2012), observed that African countries should try to extricate themselves from Western and European string and think independently towards assisting growing business which will serve as the hub for economic revolution. They added that in Nigeria there is no enough support towards SMEs and this has eroded the nature of the business in the country, that government investigate yearly execution of business policies in these set of business ventures and ‘‘so that ancillary units can get their share in national as well as international markets’’
     Dan popsecu 2011 cited in Sheetal et al (2012), stressed that government of developing countries, should create an atmosphere for investing in information and communication technologies (ICTs); exploring the internet, electronic commerce, telecommunications, building local businesses (SSEs), getting involved in systematic discoveries and science of research as a path and the improvement of capital, locating educational content that can assist and build the youth, and encourage social security schemes.
     In a similar thought Sheetal et al (2012), stressed that the place of SMEs in national development cannot be overemphasized especially in the areas of holistic development through given hands to local people to participate in the economy. They added that SMEs designed along cultural values within the natural environment help in tapping into local skills, serves as a booster and bridging the gap of unemployment and the growth of GDP.
     Conversely, some societies in Asia have recorded negative performance of SMEs which has been associated to market strategies and implementations techniques. This occurred in Sri Lanka whereby the methods of advertisement and modern innovations devices were not applied (Gajanayake, 2010). This result is different from what was obtained in India that shown SMEs as the driving device of India’s economy and chief employer of labour. An important challenge in India was centred on communication problems between consumers and the business’ owners which led to low rate of turning over (Sheetal et al., 2012).
     In the People’s Republic of China’s (PRC), that experienced radical reformation within the economic sector through the process of deregulation and globalization that made PRC’s economic growth sustained till data. This was done through bringing innovations into existing infrastructure that intensified the upgrade in the level of technology (Tracy et al., 2008). Consequently the table below described some of the model adopted by the People’s Republic of China (PRC) towards building on the technologies and creating innovation within the economy. 
Table: 2

Product Technology Capability
High
Low
Product Technology Capability

High
Fast Follower Innovation Mode (Cluster Strategy)
Process Capability Pioneering mode (Niche Strategy)
Low
Product Technology Pioneering Mode (Niche strategy
Application Specialist Mode (Free-riding strategy)
Source: Tracy et al (2008).
     Moving away from the issue of technology and innovations, there are other areas that affect consumers’ mind-set towards goods and services. The price system is a vital determining factor towards having a viable SMEs or SSEs in country. Most times business’ owners fixed high prices based on the cost of producing an item due to the cost of procuring infrastructural facilities meant to be put in place by the government through tax-payer money. This has made SSEs or SMEs not to survive or contributed meaningful to the growth of developing economies. Sometimes government of developing nations are quick in fixing prices against exploitation of masses but the question of critical infrastructural facilities are not given proper attention.  This has resulted to ethical issue and stymied the multiplication of SSEs and SMEs in Africa and other developing states.  
      The above analyses was also revealed in the investigation of Peter K. Turyakira on Ethical Practices of Small and Medium-sized Enterprises (SMEs) in Developing Countries: Literature Analysis; the researcher identified that the cause of business failure in Third World Countries is as a result of non-compliance to ethical best practices that ought to be strictly adhered. The findings equally indicated that due to the problem of ethical compliance of employees and top executives in businesses, the growth of Small and Medium-sized Enterprises has been jeopardised in Third World Countries. Hence, the researcher recommended and concludes that unethical practices among business associates particularly employee and managers have to be critically overhauled and ethical regulations have to be strictly followed for profit and business development especially SMEs in developing countries (Turyakira, 2018).
In related observation Mahmood (2008), stressed that there is need for collaboration and synergies among SMEs owners by forming a formidable alliances as clue to identify challenges and best international ethical practices. And further added that SMEs should strive to incorporate a long term business foresight as against the stereotype of short term that has heralded most business in developing countries, that imbibing both terms it will strategically aid community development. Another ethical phrase that seems instrumental to the success of business has to do with the practices of utmost good faith as the root of business revitalisation and commitment with investors. Honesty and sincerity towards business agreement, adherence to ethical codes of conduct and constitution are requisite to the growth of all kinds of business venture whether international or local (Emerson 2009).
The above notion on ethical standard was further reiterated in the work of  Peter K. Turyakira stressed that aforementioned notion of Emerson of ethical behaviour of staff and employer are noble business standard that should made know and spelt out. He asserted that:
SME owners must desist from taking unfair advantage of their employees, customers, and other stakeholders. Hence, SMEs must appreciate that doing business requires exercising good faith and honouring their promises and carrying out their responsibilities towards customers and stakeholders with goodwill and good intention. With regard to contracts and other agreements, SME owners must accurately represent their products and services, be honest in transactions and honour their promises (Turyakira, 2018).

The above analyses revealed the pitfalls within third world countries in ethical practices in business.

In another consideration, there is the view of socially responsible and ethical practices that give much gain to businessmen in a long term investment. Businesses that have succeeded globally maintained the act of honesty and integrity, trustworthy, involving in fair profitable acts, accepting commitment and being answerable for one’s own actions are vital for local in the long run (Ahmad 2009). In contemporary society, ethical and the call for social responsible behaviour are needed to grow business ventures and network towards external stakeholder organisations. For Ahmad as well identified that noted ethical practices in business serve as protection in atmosphere of unpredictability. And stressed that ethical norms in an organisation create a competitive advantage that boost business that separate itself from its rivals (Ahmad 2009), high operational ethical code of operation helps business’s owners to imbibe the act of integrity and honesty which are vital ingredients to succeed international profit oriented  competitive business (Hasnah, Ishak & Sobei 2015 cited in Turyakira, 2018).
     Extrapolating from the above analyses, the place of the government is instrumental to the growth and survival of SMEs. SMEs strategies can only be effective and efficient when there is enabling environment put in place by the government of the day. SMEs are vital for bridging the gap of unemployment and reducing the level of poverty when the businesses are sustained for a long period of time without any form of shock. SMEs in the developing nations have been poorly managed due to the nature of the society prone to crises and uncertainty. This can only be overcome when government and SMEs owners are in partnership towards building a national economy (Obah-Akpowoghaha et al. 2014)
Presentation, Analysis and Interpretation of Data.
     This section deals with the presentation analysis and interpretation of the data collected from the structured questionnaire filled and returned by 224 out of the 240 entrepreneurs initially targeted. This indicates a response rate of 93 percent.
Table 3: Socio-Demographic Characteristics of Respondent.
Variables                                             Frequency       Percentage (%)
Gender             Male                            125                  55.8% 
                        Female                         99                    44.2%
                        Total                            224                  100%

Age (years)      < 25                             16                    7.1%
                        25-44                           116                  51.8%
                        45-64                           79                    35.3%
                        >65                              13                    5.8%
Martial Status Single                           42                    18.8%
                        Married                       143                  63.8%
                        Divorced                     16                    7.1%
                        Widowed                    11                    4.9%
                        Separated                    12                    5.4%
Academic
Qualifications Primary School            15                    6.7%
                        Secondary School       82                    36.6%
                        OND, HND, BA/Bask 112                  50%
                        Masters Degree           15                    6.7%

OND = Ordinary National Diploma, HND = Higher National Diploma, BA = Bachelor of Art degree, BSc = Bachelor of Science degree.
     Table above shows that 56% of the respondents were males while 44% were females of age ranging from less than 25 (N=16, 7%), 25-44 (N=116, 52%), 45-64 (N=79, 35%), and those more than 65 years old (N=13, 6%). Most of the respondents were married (N=143, 64%) these were followed by those who were single (N=42, 19%), divorced (N=16, 7%), separated (N=12, 5%) and widows (N=11, 5%). Half (N=112, 50%) of the subjects had post-secondary education of Ordinary National Diploma (OND), Higher National Diploma (HND) or first degrees (BA, BSc). Others had secondary education (N=82, 37%), primary education (N=15, 7%) and masters degree (N=15, 7%).
Table 4: Business Characteristics of Respondents.
Variables                     Frequency                                      Percentage
Business Duration       <5 years           52                                23.2%
                                    6-10 years        93                                41.5%
                                    11-15 years      59                                26.3%
                                    16-20 years      15                                6.7%
                                    >21 years         05                                2.2%
Size of Employees      1-5                   80                                35.7%
                                    6-10                 65                                28%
                                    11-15               46                                20.5%
                                    16-20               21                                9.4%
                                    >20                  12                                5.4%
Type of Business     Agro based-
        Manufacturing    55                                24.6%
                           Textile production   78                                34.8%
                                    Leather/Shoe-
Production      34                                15.2%
                                    Education        36                                16.1%
                                    Hotel/ catering services                       21                    8%       9.4%
Table above shows that entrepreneurs who has been in business from 5years and below:
 (N=52, 23.25%), 6-10years (N=93, 42%), 11-15years (N=59, 26%), 16-20 years (N=15, 6.7%) then 20 years and above (N=5, 2.2%). SSEs with 1-5 number of employees(N=80, 36%),6-10 (N=65,28%),11-15 (N=46,21%),16-20 (N=21,9.4%) then 20 and above (N=12,5.4%) entrepreneurs who engage in Agro-base/manufacturing (N=55,25%) textile production (N78.35%), Leather/Shoe production(N=34,15.2%), Education (N=36,16.1%) the hotel catering (N=21,9.4%).

Table 5:  Promotional strategies used by Small-scale Enterprises.
Strategies        Rarely  Never             Sometimes                   Frequently
                   [Number (%)]   [Number (%)]     [Number (%)]             [Number (%)]
Television        35(15.6)           114(50.9)         42(18.8)                       33(14.7)
Newspaper      8(3.6)               114(71.9)         39(17.4)                       16(7.1)
Outdoor          8(3.6)               128(57.1)         62(27.7)                       26(11.6)
Display            12(5.4)             114(50.9)         42(18.8)                       56(25.0)
Billboard         12(5.4)             141(62.9)         43(19.2)                       28(12.5)
Radio              16(7.1)             104(46.4)         62(27.1)                       42(18.8)
Contests          13(5.8)             141(62.9)         44(19.6)                       25(11.2)
Gift items        18(8.0)             125(55.8)         55(24.6)                       26(11.6)
Promotion       10(4.5)             152(67.9)         39(17.4)                       23(10.3)
Print media      9(40.0)             167(74.6)         26(11.6)                       22(5.8)
Broadcast        7(3.1)               168(75.0)         36(16.1)                       13(5.0)
Out of home    9(4.0)               153(68.3)         42(18.8)                       20(8.9)
Direct-
Advertising     11(4.9)             138(61.6)         34(15.2)                       41(18.3)

The promotional strategies used by SSEs are shown in table above. Majority of the SSEs used Radio (N= 120, 54%)   frequently (N= 42, 19%), Sometimes (N= 62, 27%) and rarely (N= 16, 7%). This was followed by Television (N=110, 49%) that was used frequently (N=33, 15%), Sometimes (N=42, 90%), rarely (N=35, 16%) and Display (N=110, 49%) used frequently (N=33, 15%), Sometimes (N=42, 19%), rarely (N=12, 5%). Other promotional strategies used include: Gift items (N=99,44%), frequently (N=26,12%) sometimes (N=55,25%) rarely (N=18,8%), outdoor (N=96,43%) frequently (N=26,12%), sometimes (N=62,28%) rarely (N=8,4%), direct advertising (N=86,38%), frequently (N=41,18%), sometimes (N=11,5%), Billboard (N=83,37%), frequently (N=28,13%), sometimes (N=43,19%), rarely (N=12,5%), contest (N=82,37%), frequently (N=25,11%) sometimes (N=44,20%), rarely (N=13,6%), promotion (N=72,32%) frequently (N=23,10%), sometimes (N=39,17%),rarely (N=10,5%), out of home (N=71,32%), frequently (N=20,9%) sometimes (N=42,19%), rarely (N=9,40%), Newspaper (N=63,28%), frequently (N= 16,7%), sometimes(N=39,17%) rarely (N=8,4%); print media (N=57,25%) frequently (N=22,10%), sometimes (N=226,11%), rarely (N=9,4%) and broadcast (N= 56,25%) frequently (N=13,6%) sometimes (N=36,16%) rarely (N=7,3%.
 Most of the SSEs did not use broadcast (N=168, 75%), print media (N=167, 75%), Newspaper (N=114,72%),  out of home  (N=153,68%), promotion (N=152,68%), contest (N=141,63%), Bill board (N=141,63%), direct advertising (N=138,62%), outdoor (N=128,57%), gift items (N=125,56%), Television (N= 114,51%), display (N= 114,51%) while the remaining did not use radio (N=104,46%)
Table 6: Influence of Promotional strategies used on Growth of Small-scale Enterprises

Variables                                             Growth Pattern
                        Increasing        Decreasing      Static               Total               
Profit               108 (48.2%)    17 (7.6%)        99 (44.2%)      224 (100%)
Turnover          117 (52.2%)    4 (1.8%)          103 (46.0%)    224 (100%)
Coverage         112 (50.0%)    12 (5.4%)        100 (44.6%)    224 (100%)
CAOOE          111 (49.6%)    17 (7.6%)        96 (42.9%)      224 (100%)
                                                                                                                                                 
CAOOE= Competitive Advantage Over Other Enterprise
As can be seen in table above, growth was recorded among SSEs that used PS in the form of increase in profit (N=108, 48%), turnover (N=117,52%), coverage (N=112,50%), and CAOOE (N=111,50%). Those that did not use PS either remained static in profit (N=99,44%), turnover (N=103,46%), coverage (N=100,45%) and CAOOE (N=96,43%) or recorded a decrease in profit (N=17,8%), turnover (N=4,2%), coverage (N=12,5%) and CAOOE (N=17,8%).                        
Hypotheses Testing
Hypothesis one: There is no significant relationship between growth of small-scale enterprises and advertising.
Table 7: Relationship between Small-scale Enterprises, Growth and Advertising.
Small-scale Enterprise Growth
                    ADVERTISING
Total
Rarely
Never
Sometimes
Frequently
Decreasing
1  14.29%
0
0.00%
2
28.57%
4
57.14%
7
100.00%
Static
2
7.69%
4
15.38%
8
30.27%
12
46.15%
26
100.00%
Increasing
10
5.24%
119
62.30%
25
13.09%
37
19.37%
191
100.00%
Total
13
5.80%
123
54.91%
35
15.63%
53
25.66%
224
100.00%
                   Chi (6) = 29.9907   significant-value = 0.0000 < 0.05    
Among the 7 respondents that were interviewed on advertising’s contribution to the growth of small-scale enterprises in Nigeria, 14.29%, 0.00%, 28.57% and 57.14% reported that advertising rarely, never, sometimes and frequently Decreases the growth of small-scale enterprises respectively. Out of Twenty six (26) respondents 7.69%, 15.38%, 30.27% and 46.15% reported that advertising rarely, never, sometimes and frequently made the growth of small-scale enterprises to be static in Nigeria respectively. And finally, from 191 respondents 5.24%, 62.30%, 13.09% and 19.37% reported that advertising rarely, never, sometimes and frequently increasing the growth of small-scale enterprises in Nigeria. The chi-squared test in table 5 showed that there is a significant relationship between advertising and the growth of small-scale enterprises among the small-scale business owners in Nigeria since significant value= 0.000<0.05 .
Hypothesis two: There is no significant relationship between growth of small-scale enterprises and sales promotion.
Table 8:   Relationships between Small-scale Enterprises, Growth and Sales Promotion
Small-scale Enterprise Growth
                    SALES PROMOTION
Total
Rarely
Never
Sometimes
Frequently
Decreasing
0
0.00%
1
100.00%
0
0.00%
0
0.00%
1
100.00%
Static
2
0.00%
16
50.00%
5
21.90%
9
28.10%
32
100.00%
Increasing
1
0.5%
26
13.60%
98
51.30%
66
34.60%
191
100.00%
Total
3
1.34%
43
19.20%
103
45.98%
75
33.48%
224
100.00%
                    Chi (6) = 37.7716  sig-value = 0.000< 0.05
Only one respondent that were interviewed on sales promotion’s contribution to the growth of small-scale enterprises in Nigeria, 0.00%, 100.00%, 0.00% and 0.00% reported that sales promotion rarely, never, sometimes and frequently decreases the growth of small-scale enterprises respectively.
            Out of 32 respondents 0.00%, 50.00%, 21.90% and 28.10% reported that sales promotion rarely, never, sometimes and frequently made the growth of small-scale enterprises to be static in Nigeria respectively. And finally, from 191 respondents 0.50%, 13.60%, 51.30% and 34.60% who reported that advertising rarely, never, sometimes and frequently increasing the growth of small-scale enterprises in Nigeria. The chi-squared test in table 6 showed that there is a significant relationship between sales promotion and the growth of small-scale enterprises among the small-scale business owners in Nigeria since 0.000<0.05 . And the majority of the respondents interviewed reported sales promotion frequently and sometimes facilitates and increases the growth of small-scale enterprises in Nigeria.
Findings and Conclusion
     This study examined the various promotional strategies (PS) used by small-scale enterprises (SSEs) and investigated the factor that influenced the choice of PS adopted by SSEs in the country. It also evaluated the effect of PS on the growth of SSEs in the country. These were with the view to providing information on PS that could enhance growth of SSEs in Nigeria and assist entrepreneurs in the development of their businesses in the country. The result showed that the various promotional strategies used by SSEs in Nigeria included display (25%), advertising (18%), radio (19%), Television (15%), Gift items (12%), and billboard(13%) . Result further showed that the major factors that influence the choice of promotional strategies used SSEs were the cost implication of using PS(73%), resource of SSEs (79%) and growth orientation (73%) while other factors included location of business(71%) , management approach (86%) and overall success and survival rate(79%) finally the result showed that promotional strategies had no significant effect on advertising(t=0.53; p>0.05), sales promotion (t=1.01; p>0.05) and product packaging (t=0.80, p>0.05) the growth of SSEs in Nigeria. The study concluded that though promotional strategies enhance growth of SSEs, nonetheless, the Nigerian small-scale enterprises fail to use these promotional strategies to their advantages.
References
Ahmad, N.H., (2009). ‘Doing well by doing good. A study of ethical and socially responsible
practices among entrepreneurial ventures in an emerging economy’, Frontiers of Entrepreneurship Research 29(12), 1–15.

Beck, T.; Demirgüç-Kunt, A. and Levine, R. (2003). Small and Medium Enterprises, Growth,
and Poverty: Cross-Country Evidence.

David C., Audrey .G., Darryl .C, O'Donnell, Grant, A.K. (1998),"Price setting in SMEs:
some empirical findings", Journal of Product & Brand Management, Vol. 7 Iss: 1 pp. 74 – 86

Emerson, R.W., (2009). Barron’s Business Law, Barron’s Educational Series, Inc.,
Hauppauge, NY.
Essien, D. (I995). ‘Managing Small-scale Business   Small Business Management Port Harcourt, University of Port Harcourt Press Ltd.

European Commission, (2003) “Recommendation 2003/361/EC; SME Definition” Retrieved (2013-06-06) .Firms Performance, University of Minnesota, Working Paper.

Gajanayake, R. (2010),” The Impact of Marketing Strategies and Behavior of Small and
Medium Enterprises on their Business Growth” , Accessed: 20/2/ 2012

Kotler, P. and Keller, K.l. (2008), Marketing Management, 12th revised ed., Prentice Hall,
Singapore.

Muriithi, S. (2017).  African Small and Medium Enterprises (SMEs) Contributions,
Challenges and Solutions: European Journal of Research and Reflection in Management Sciences Vol. 5 No. 1. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/315516536. Accessed 11/04/2019

Obah-Akpowoghaha, N.G ;  Badejo, B.T and  Ogunmilade, A. (2014). New-Technologies as
a Recipe for Mitigating the ills of Capitalism and Underdevelopment in Africa.
Australian Journal of Business and Management Research Vol.4 No.1; PP: 1-7

Sheetal; Sangeeta;  Kumar, R. (2012). Marketing Strategies of Small and Medium
Enterprises: A Sample Survey. IJMRS’s International Journal of Management Sciences, Vol. 1: No. 2. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/261721534. Accessed: 16/04/2019.

Tracy, Y., Jamus .J. L., and Toshiki, K. (2008). Strategies for the People’s Republic of
China’s Small and Medium Enterprise Development within the National Innovation System. Asian Development Bank Institute. All rights reserved.
www.adbi.org/publications. Accessed: 23/04/2019

Turyakira, P.K., (2018). ‘Ethical practices of small and medium-sized enterprises in
developing countries: Literature analysis’, South African Journal of Economic and Management Sciences 21(1), a1756. https://doi.org/ 10.4102/sajems.v21i1.1756
United Nations, (2008). SSE Development and foreign Direct investment in Africa. Challenges and Opportunities.  Www.unOrg/africa/osaa/reports/FD-Study-2008-z.pdF. Accessed 06/06/2013

Wheelmen, T.L and Hunger, J.D. (2000) Strategic Management Business Policy Seventh Edition New York: Addison Wesley Longman.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

African Journal of Politics and Administration, Volume 2, Number 1, April 2019

Volume 2 (April), 2019: 64 – 76. THEORIZING STRUCTURAL CAUSES, CONSEQUENCES OF FRAGILITY, DECLINE AND FAILURES OF THE WESTPHALIAN STATE MODEL: CRITICAL REVIEW OF PARSON AND COMTE

Volume 2 (April), 2019: 1 – 14. WOMEN AND POVERTY IN THE NIGER DELTA REGION OF NIGERIA: STRATEGIES FOR ECONOMIC EMPOWERMENT